September 24,
2000 - Party seq #2 with Kim Lannon
So
we finally got to use Kim Lannon
in the movie! As I had mentioned earlier, I had pegged Kim
Lannon as the hired, annoying girlfriend back on January 3rd.
She had told everyone that she's gonna be in this indie movie
and had sent a few people to this site. It's now August and
all her buddies were going, "so when are you going to even
be IN this epic production?" Well, it took 9 months of "we're
getting closer..I swear!", but we did it. At least my theory
of "Even if we're out of money, we can still shoot because
we OWN the equipment" is sound. I'm basically out of money
and we're still shooting! Note: there's money coming (from
assorted jobs I've pulled), but it ain't here NOW.
Todays shoot was
Amanda's party sequence number two. (Scenes 98 through 106)
6 pages of script to chew through. The scene starts with Johnny
and Darleen (Kim Lannon) together at Amanda's party, Johnny
starts talking about how one can buy a cow for only a hundred
bucks in Texas, and how it would supply a ton of food for
a keg party. Darleen acts completely annoyed at everything
and everyone. The others wonder why Johnny is apparently going
out with her. We learn that Johnny had hired Darleen to BE
an old girlfriend just for this party. (The implied joke here
is that the longer you have a a girlfriend, the more demanding
and bitchy they get.) I had sent this apology via e-mail to
all the women in the cast:
===== Disclaimer to the women of the cast of alt.sex ======
Yes, this script was written by a GUY and this script expresses
the delusion of said writer. Certainly it's the warped perspective
of this writer that girlfriends (i.e. women) become like
this after a while. (annoying and bitchy) The writer also
realizes that GUYS (male boyfriends) become just as annoying
after a while to women. (I guess we slowly become lazy,
indifferent and smelly, or so I've heard.) But because this
story has a male lead, it will pander to the whims of the
male ego. I apologize. I'm sorry we had to film this tripe.
I even apologize for a pervious comment which went along
the lines of "girlfriends a like batteries, after 90 minutes
you use them up and throw them out." I disavow any relationship
to such comment, even though I did laugh at it.
===== end disclaimer =======
Kim
Lannon was great for this part. (Even though she isn't the
least bit bitchy or annoying.) One thing we found was that
eye contact (or lack of thereof) made a big difference in
the scenes between her and Johnny. She initially played the
scenes with a fair amount of eye contact, making her appear
more angry. When we played the scene with her avoiding eye
contact with Johnny, she came off as more aloof. Interesting
stuff, you can't really write this into a script, you've just
got to play with it when you are there.
I'm quite grateful
that Dave Chubet (the owner of the house that we were shooting
in) was there for the day. Dave and I were in a rock band
called "Fingle Bunt", and we're known each other since 1987.
(I think there's a whole movie on that subject that might
come out of me, I dunno.) He cooked up all sorts of food for
the crew and was in the background for a couple of shots.
We told him that he would get a catering credit in the movie,
and we needed a name for his company. He said it would be
called; "Here...eat this." Dave Chubet and his wonderful and
charming wife Paula are the couple who are leaving the party
as Amanda practically boots them out the door at the end of
this sequence. (Bit of irony...no?)
A semi-major fuck
up was the fact that my second roll of film was double perforated.
I had gotten a couple of rolls of 16mm film in exchange for
helping out on a commercial film shoot for a cinematographer
called Doug Shafer. The new rolls that he bought for this
shoot were "single perf." (Sprocket holes on only one side
of the film, which ables you to shoot a wider super 16mm frame.)
He had some older "double perf" film as backup stock. (Double
perf film is the older style, there is sprocket holes on both
sides of the film. Normally you can't shoot a wider frame
because you will see the holes on one side of the film.) I
had spooled up the newer stuff into my camera and threw the
other roll of film into my kit. When the time came to change
rolls of film, I spool up the other can of film and THEN notice
that there's two rolls of sprocket holes.
I only had something
like 6 lines of dialogue left to shoot. Instead of packing
up and calling it a night, I just went ahead and shot super
16mm on double perf film. Screw it. I'm hoping I can do a
slight blow-up on the video transfer to avoid getting the
holes into the frame. What happens when the time comes to
cut the negative into a 35mm print, I dunno. I know that you
still have to crop a little off the top and bottom of super
16mm to get it to fit into 35mm. I'm pretty sure the video
transfers will look fine, but I'll probably hafta come back
to Dave Chubet's house to get the last few shots again. Damn.
Dave w banjo
|
Emery boom
|
Eric w camera
|
Geoff porch CU
|
Juliet & Dan piano
|
Kim & Johnny
|
Phil gets bit again
|
The caterer
|
Kim, Juliet, Johnny
|
Kim vamps
|
Johnnys hotdog
|
Kim on porch
|
September
30, 2000 - Laurens B-day party
Lauren
was having a birthday bash at her place, so she invited everyone
from the film. (Along with her real friends.) I had gotten
a good "reading" of the film from a little preview showing
of some of the edited footage earlier in the summer when Lauren
threw an outdoor party. (Note: she claimed that this earlier
party was gonna be wild. What bunch of "adults" can be totally
loose when they've got their children watching them? Then
she announced that she was going to get stinking drunk at
her birthday party. Not one bit of vomit came out of her.
I was disappointed.) :-)
At this point,
I had about 36 minutes of the film roughly edited. Short sequences
mostly, but I threw them together into a linear order. We
had a crowd of Lauren's buddies (mostly 40 year olds) with
us around her TV set. We got a couple of laughs and a bunch
of positive remarks from our little preview. Sounds promising,
even though I felt that this wasn't my target audience. Deirdre
Williams hadn't seen any of the footage up until now and
was very positive. (Good to have some "fresh eyes" look at
what you've done.) She thought that the characters were identifiable
and that the pacing was good and it seemed to feel like a
movie, verses just a bunch of unconnected comedy sketches.
This is a good thing.
Eric's beard
|
Lauren's hairpiece
|
We're # 1
|
Phil's boot fetish
|
Next
| Previous | Journal
Home Page
|